Claim Status Payer List: 468 Connection Entries

Search the payer connection entries currently listed for RCM Edge Claim Status. Connection names may represent specific plans or workflows, and availability can change. Confirm the payer ID, plan, transaction, and use case your team needs during evaluation.

Listed Connection Entries 468
Electronic Standard 276/277
Bulk Workflow Supported
Evaluation Method Payer by Payer
Availability Confirm Current
HIPAA Compliant
SOC 2 Type II
X12 / EDI Ready
Response Timing Varies
Human Exception Review

A three-step claim status workflow

RCM Edge helps separate repeatable status retrieval from exception work. Exact connection method, response timing, and returned fields vary by payer and workflow.

1

Define the Claim Cohort

Select representative payers, claim types, ages, balances, and locations. Confirm required data fields and integration options before a pilot.

2

Run Supported Status Queries

Edge Claims runs eligible inquiries through supported payer workflows. Coverage and response behavior should be validated for the payer IDs and plans in your cohort.

3

Review Statuses and Exceptions

Returned statuses are organized for review so your team can assign documentation, correction, denial, or payer-follow-up actions.

Payers Supported for Claim Status

This directory contains 468 payer connection entries. Display names may include plan-specific variants or separate connections with the same payer name. Confirm the payer ID, plan, transaction, and current availability for your workflow.

468 Connections
Filter:

468 connection entries found

No payers found

Try a different search term or reset the filter.

What to confirm for every payer connection

A matching payer name is the start of validation, not proof that every plan, transaction, or response field is supported.

Payer ID and Plan

Confirm the payer ID, plan, line of business, state, and submitting entity used by your representative claims.

Match Your Cohort

Transaction and Access

Confirm whether the workflow uses a supported 276/277 transaction, payer endpoint, or approved portal process.

Validate Method

Returned Information

Test representative responses, normalization, required identifiers, status categories, and missing-data handling.

Review Responses

Exceptions and Maintenance

Define fallbacks for unsupported claims, authentication changes, downtime, ambiguous statuses, and payer updates.

Assign Ownership

Evaluate the workflow behind the payer list

Coverage only creates value when returned statuses are usable, exceptions have owners, and the team completes the next action.

276/277 Where Supported

Confirm which payer connections support the adopted electronic claim-status request and response standard and which use another approved method.

Bulk Claim Status Workflows

Define eligible claim cohorts and test batch inquiry volume, usable response coverage, retry behavior, and exception capacity.

Status Normalization

Review how payer-specific responses are mapped into consistent operational categories and how ambiguous results are handled.

Exception Work Queues

Apply approved rules to route documentation requests, rejections, denials, pending claims, and other exceptions to people.

Connection Monitoring

Evaluate failure detection, authentication handling, retry controls, maintenance ownership, and fallback procedures.

Ownership and Measurement

Define owners, due dates, escalations, access controls, activity records, and pilot metrics before expanding volume.

Understand the workflow before selecting connections

Use these resources to separate payer coverage, connection method, operational fit, and the commercial product decision.

Claim Status Automation

Review the commercial workflow, current capabilities, evaluation questions, and demo path.

Explore the Product

Manual vs Automated

Compare staff-led inquiry work with batch retrieval and human exception handling.

Read the Comparison

API vs Portal

Evaluate connection coverage, authentication, response format, maintenance, and fallbacks.

Compare Methods

Official Standard

CMS identifies ASC X12N 276/277 Version 5010 as the adopted claim-status inquiry and response standard.

Read CMS Guidance

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about RCM Edge's payer network for claim status.

This directory contains 468 payer connection entries. It is not a claim of 468 unique payer companies: plan-specific entries and separate connections can share or overlap payer names. Confirm the payer ID, plan, transaction, and current workflow support for your claim cohort.
No. Connection method, authentication, returned fields, and response timing vary by payer and workflow. Some connections may support 276/277 transactions; others may use a payer-specific method. Validate representative scenarios before rollout.
Yes. Edge Claims supports bulk claim status workflows across supported connections. During a pilot, measure eligible volume, usable responses, unsupported or failed inquiries, staff touch time, exception volume, and time to next action.
Contact the RCM Edge team with the payer name, payer ID, plan, state, transaction, and representative use case. The team can confirm current support or discuss whether the connection belongs on the product roadmap; no availability or delivery date is implied.
Search the directory for the specific program or plan, then confirm the payer ID, jurisdiction, connection method, identifiers, and returned status fields. A payer brand appearing in the directory does not prove that every government program or plan variant is supported.
Yes. Edge Verify has a separate directory of 566 eligibility payer connections. Claim Status and Eligibility are different workflows and counts. View the eligibility payer connection list →

Confirm your payer mix and workflow

Bring representative payer IDs, plans, claim types, current inquiry methods, and exception categories to a 30-minute demo. Please do not enter patient or claim details in the booking form.